Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Radeon Pro 460
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 460 is positioned at rank 176 and the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is on rank 479, so the Radeon Pro 460 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 460
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 460.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Terascale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $150), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Radeon Pro 460
The Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,453 points.
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 12 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 2240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 460 scores 3,453 and the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire reaches 3,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 460 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire uses Terascale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 460) vs 2,240 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,453 | 3,500+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Terascale 2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2240+119% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 460 draws 35W versus the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire's 50W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 460) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-30% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 98.7+41% | 70.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 460 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire launched at $699 and now averages $150. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.0 (Radeon Pro 460) vs 23.3 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire) — the Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire offers 1.3% better value. The Radeon Pro 460 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-28% | $699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.0 | 23.3+1% |
| Codename | Baffin | Blackcomb XTX |
| Release | October 30 2016 | July 12 2011 |
| Ranking | #547 | #517 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
