Radeon Pro 465 vs FirePro S7000
Radeon Pro 465
Popular choices:
FirePro S7000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 465 is positioned at rank 152 and the FirePro S7000 is on rank 241, so the Radeon Pro 465 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 465
Performance Per Dollar FirePro S7000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 465 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro S7000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 465 | FirePro S7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (292mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro S7000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro S7000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $150), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 273.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 465 | FirePro S7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+273.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 465 and FirePro S7000
Radeon Pro 465
The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.
FirePro S7000
The FirePro S7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,524 points. Launch price was $1,249.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 465 scores 4,538 and the FirePro S7000 reaches 4,524 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 465 is built on GCN 4.0 while the FirePro S7000 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465) vs 1,280 (FirePro S7000). Raw compute: 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro S7000).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | FirePro S7000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,538 | 4,524 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1280+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.858 TFLOPS | 2.432 TFLOPS+31% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 320 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | FirePro S7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 465 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro S7000 has 4 GB. The FirePro S7000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 465) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro S7000) — the Radeon Pro 465 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | FirePro S7000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 465 draws 35W versus the FirePro S7000's 150W — a 124.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 465) vs 350W (FirePro S7000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | FirePro S7000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-77% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 292mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 129.7+329% | 30.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 465 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the FirePro S7000 launched at $1249 and now averages $40. The FirePro S7000 costs 73.3% less ($110 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.3 (Radeon Pro 465) vs 113.1 (FirePro S7000) — the FirePro S7000 offers 273.3% better value. The Radeon Pro 465 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | FirePro S7000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-60% | $1249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $40-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.3 | 113.1+273% |
| Codename | Baffin | Pitcairn |
| Release | October 30 2016 | August 27 2012 |
| Ranking | #547 | #462 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 465 and FirePro S7000
