
Radeon Pro 465 vs GeForce GTX 580

Radeon Pro 465
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro 465 is positioned at rank #152 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 465
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 465 is significantly newer (2016 vs 2010). The Radeon Pro 465 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 580 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 580 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 465.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 465 | GeForce GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 580 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 580 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $150), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 410.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 465 | GeForce GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+410.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 465 and GeForce GTX 580

Radeon Pro 465
The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.

GeForce GTX 580
The GeForce GTX 580 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 9 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 772 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 244W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,634 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 465 scores 4,538 and the GeForce GTX 580 reaches 4,634 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 465 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 580 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465) vs 512 (GeForce GTX 580). Raw compute: 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465) vs 1.581 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 580).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | GeForce GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,538 | 4,634+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+100% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.858 TFLOPS+18% | 1.581 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | GeForce GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 465 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 580 has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 580 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 465) vs 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 580) — the Radeon Pro 465 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | GeForce GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 3 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 384-bit+500% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 465 draws 35W versus the GeForce GTX 580's 244W — a 149.8% difference. The Radeon Pro 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 465) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 580). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | GeForce GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-86% | 244W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 C |
| Perf/Watt | 129.7+583% | 19.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 465 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 580 launched at $499 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 580 costs 80% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.3 (Radeon Pro 465) vs 154.5 (GeForce GTX 580) — the GeForce GTX 580 offers 409.9% better value. The Radeon Pro 465 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | GeForce GTX 580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $30-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.3 | 154.5+410% |
| Codename | Baffin | GF110 |
| Release | October 30 2016 | November 9 2010 |
| Ranking | #547 | #458 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












