Radeon Pro 465 vs Arc Graphics 130V
Radeon Pro 465
Popular choices:
Arc Graphics 130V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 465 is positioned at rank 152 and the Arc Graphics 130V is on rank 302, so the Radeon Pro 465 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 465
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 130V
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 130V is significantly newer (2024 vs 2016). The Arc Graphics 130V likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro 465 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 465 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 130V.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 465 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | Xe² (2024) (3nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 465 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $250 for the Arc Graphics 130V, it costs 40% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 67.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 465 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+67.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 465 and Arc Graphics 130V
Radeon Pro 465
The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.
Arc Graphics 130V
The Arc Graphics 130V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 1850 MHz. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,510 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 465 scores 4,538 and the Arc Graphics 130V reaches 4,510 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 465 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Arc Graphics 130V uses Xe², both on 14 nm vs 3 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465) vs 7 (Arc Graphics 130V). Boost clocks: 907 MHz vs 1850 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,538 | 4,510 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Xe² |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+14529% | 7 |
| Boost Clock | 907 MHz | 1850 MHz+104% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 465 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 130V has 0 MB. The Radeon Pro 465 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 465 draws 35W versus the Arc Graphics 130V's 15W — a 80% difference. The Arc Graphics 130V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 465) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 130V). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W | 15W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 129.7 | 300.7+132% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 465 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Arc Graphics 130V launched at $300 and now averages $250. The Radeon Pro 465 costs 40% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.3 (Radeon Pro 465) vs 18.0 (Arc Graphics 130V) — the Radeon Pro 465 offers 68.3% better value. The Arc Graphics 130V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 465 | Arc Graphics 130V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $300-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-40% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.3+68% | 18.0 |
| Codename | Baffin | Lunar Lake iGPU |
| Release | October 30 2016 | September 24 2024 |
| Ranking | #547 | #463 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 465 and Arc Graphics 130V
