
Radeon Pro 560X vs GeForce GTX 680M SLI

Radeon Pro 560X
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 680M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 680M SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 560X is significantly newer (2018 vs 2012). The Radeon Pro 560X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 680M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro 560X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 680M SLI.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 560X | GeForce GTX 680M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro 560X remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 560X and GeForce GTX 680M SLI

Radeon Pro 560X
The Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1004 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

GeForce GTX 680M SLI
The GeForce GTX 680M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 4 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,569 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 560X scores 3,678 and the GeForce GTX 680M SLI reaches 3,569 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 560X is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 680M SLI uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 2,688 (GeForce GTX 680M SLI).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | GeForce GTX 680M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,678+3% | 3,569 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2688+163% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | GeForce GTX 680M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | GeForce GTX 680M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680M SLI). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | GeForce GTX 680M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon Pro 560X) vs NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GTX 680M SLI). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 560X) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 680M SLI).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | GeForce GTX 680M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | NVENC (1st Gen) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 560X draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 680M SLI's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 680M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 560X) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 680M SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | GeForce GTX 680M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 49.0+3% | 47.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 560X is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 560X | GeForce GTX 680M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | — |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | N13E-GTX |
| Release | July 16 2018 | June 4 2012 |
| Ranking | #528 | #385 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















