
Radeon Pro 570 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro 570 is positioned at rank #78 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 570
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 570.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 570 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $65 (vs $100), it costs 35% less, resulting in a 54.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 570 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+54.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($65) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 570 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 570 scores 6,337 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti reaches 6,350 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 570 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti uses Pascal, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Raw compute: 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570) vs 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Boost clocks: 1105 MHz vs 1392 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,337 | 6,350 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+133% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.96 TFLOPS+85% | 2.138 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1105 MHz | 1392 MHz+26% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+133% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+56% | 288 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) — the Radeon Pro 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 570 draws 120W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti's 70W — a 52.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 570) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 70W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 211mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8 | 90.7+72% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti launched at $140 and now averages $65. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti costs 35% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 63.4 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 97.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 54.1% better value. The Radeon Pro 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $140-53% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $65-35% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.4 | 97.7+54% |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | GP107 |
| Release | June 5 2017 | October 25 2016 |
| Ranking | #382 | #381 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















