
Radeon Pro 570 vs T600

Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:

T600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 570 is positioned at rank 78 and the T600 is on rank 36, so the T600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 570
Performance Per Dollar T600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The T600 uses modern memory architecture. The T600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro 570 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The T600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 570.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 570 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $180 for the T600, it costs 44% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 77.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 570 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+77.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($180) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 570 and T600

Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

T600
The T600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,425 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 570 scores 6,337 and the T600 reaches 6,425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 570 is built on GCN 4.0 while the T600 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 640 (T600). Raw compute: 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570) vs 1.709 TFLOPS (T600). Boost clocks: 1105 MHz vs 1335 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,337 | 6,425+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+180% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.96 TFLOPS+132% | 1.709 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1105 MHz | 1335 MHz+21% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+180% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 640 KB+43% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) vs 1 MB (T600) — the Radeon Pro 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 570 draws 120W versus the T600's 40W — a 100% difference. The T600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 570) vs 350W (T600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 40W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 156mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8 | 160.6+204% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the T600 launched at $200 and now averages $180. The Radeon Pro 570 costs 44.4% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 63.4 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 35.7 (T600) — the Radeon Pro 570 offers 77.6% better value. The T600 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | T600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $200-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-44% | $180 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.4+78% | 35.7 |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | TU117 |
| Release | June 5 2017 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #382 | #378 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













