Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro 570
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is positioned at rank 8 and the Radeon Pro 570 is on rank 78, so the Quadro P3200 Max-Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro 570 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 570.
| Insight | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P3200 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3200 Max-Q and Radeon Pro 570
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.
Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q scores 6,500 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 5.032 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 1404 MHz vs 1105 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,500+3% | 6,337 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.032 TFLOPS+27% | 3.96 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1404 MHz+27% | 1105 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 672 KB+50% | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 46.2% difference. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-38% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 86.7+64% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $100 |
| Codename | GP104 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #292 | #382 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P3200 Max-Q and Radeon Pro 570
