Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro 570

NVIDIA

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

2018Core: 1139 MHzBoost: 1404 MHz
Similar parts
·
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 570

2017Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1105 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro 570 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro 570 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro 570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

2018

Why buy it

  • 9.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Radeon Pro 570 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 75W instead of 120W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon Pro 570

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro P3200 Max-Q across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 60% higher power demand at 120W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (6,500 vs 6,337), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2018 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro 570 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro 570 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro P3200 Max-Q has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro 570 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro 570

The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q scores 6,500 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 5.032 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 1404 MHz vs 1105 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P3200 Max-QRadeon Pro 570
G3D Mark Score
6,500+3%
6,337
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 4.0
Process Node
16 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1792
1792
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.032 TFLOPS+27%
3.96 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1404 MHz+27%
1105 MHz
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
112
112
L1 Cache
672 KB+50%
448 KB
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P3200 Max-QRadeon Pro 570
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P3200 Max-Q and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 570. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P3200 Max-QRadeon Pro 570
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 46.2% difference. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro P3200 Max-QRadeon Pro 570
TDP
75W-38%
120W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
86.7+64%
52.8
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro P3200 Max-Q (2018 vs 2017).

FeatureQuadro P3200 Max-QRadeon Pro 570
MSRP
$300
Codename
GP104
Polaris 20
Release
February 21 2018
June 5 2017
Ranking
#292
#382

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.