Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Quadro T1000

NVIDIA

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

2018Core: 1139 MHzBoost: 1404 MHz
Similar parts
·
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro T1000

2019Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1455 MHz
Similar parts
·

Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Quadro T1000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Quadro T1000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Quadro T1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

2018

Why buy it

  • 32.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
  • 50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quadro T1000

2019

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
  • More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro P3200 Max-Q across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 32.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro T1000 instead at 6,505 vs 6,500, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro T1000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 16nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro T1000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro P3200 Max-Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Quadro T1000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro T1000

The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q scores 6,500 and the Quadro T1000 reaches 6,505 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Quadro T1000 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Boost clocks: 1404 MHz vs 1455 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P3200 Max-QQuadro T1000
G3D Mark Score
6,500
6,505
Architecture
Pascal
Turing
Process Node
16 nm
12 nm
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
1455 MHz+4%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P3200 Max-QQuadro T1000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P3200 Max-Q and 256-bit on the Quadro T1000.

FeatureQuadro P3200 Max-QQuadro T1000
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro P3200 Max-QQuadro T1000
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000).

FeatureQuadro P3200 Max-QQuadro T1000
Encoder
6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)
5th Gen NVENC (Turing)
Decoder
3rd Gen NVDEC
4th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2
H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q draws 75W versus the Quadro T1000's 50W — a 40% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 350W (Quadro T1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.

FeatureQuadro P3200 Max-QQuadro T1000
TDP
75W
50W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
156mm
Height
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
65°C-13%
Perf/Watt
86.7
130.1+50%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro T1000 (2019 vs 2018).

FeatureQuadro P3200 Max-QQuadro T1000
MSRP
$400
Codename
GP104
TU117
Release
February 21 2018
May 27 2019
Ranking
#292
#376

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.