Quadro M4000 vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M4000 vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M4000 vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M4000

2015

Why buy it

✅2.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($791 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

2018

Why buy it

✅Quadro M4000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $791 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro M4000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (6,679 vs 6,500), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro M4000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro M4000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro P3200 Max-Q has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro M4000 vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M4000

The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M4000 scores 6,679 and the Quadro P3200 Max-Q reaches 6,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M4000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro P3200 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M4000) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000) vs 5.032 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1013 MHz vs 1404 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M4000	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score	6,679+3%	6,500
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	1,280	1792+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.496 TFLOPS	5.032 TFLOPS+102%
Boost Clock	1013 MHz	1404 MHz+39%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	80	112+40%
L1 Cache	480 KB	672 KB+40%
L2 Cache	2 MB+33%	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M4000	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M4000 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3200 Max-Q carries 4 GB. Quadro M4000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro M4000 and 256-bit on the Quadro P3200 Max-Q. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M4000) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) — the Quadro M4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M4000	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+33%	1.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro M4000	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q).

Feature	Quadro M4000	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Encoder	5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	1st Gen NVDEC	3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4	H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M4000 draws 100W versus the Quadro P3200 Max-Q's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M4000) vs 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Quadro M4000	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
TDP	100W	75W-25%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	82°C	75°C-9%
Perf/Watt	66.8	86.7+30%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro P3200 Max-Q (2018 vs 2015).

Feature	Quadro M4000	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
MSRP	$791	—
Codename	GM204	GP104
Release	August 18 2015	February 21 2018
Ranking	#392	#292

Search Quadro M4000 on Amazon

Search Quadro P3200 Max-Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.