Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro WX 7130

NVIDIA

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

2018Core: 1139 MHzBoost: 1404 MHz
Similar parts
·
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016Core: 1188 MHzBoost: 1243 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro WX 7130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

2018

Why buy it

  • Radeon Pro WX 7130 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 75W instead of 130W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 7130 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016

Why buy it

  • 16.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 73.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro WX 7130 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 16.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P3200 Max-Q instead at 6,500 vs 6,406, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 7130 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 7130 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro P3200 Max-Q has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 7130

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q scores 6,500 and the Radeon Pro WX 7130 reaches 6,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Raw compute: 5.032 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Boost clocks: 1404 MHz vs 1243 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P3200 Max-QRadeon Pro WX 7130
G3D Mark Score
6,500+1%
6,406
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 4.0
Process Node
16 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1792
2304+29%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.032 TFLOPS
5.728 TFLOPS+14%
Boost Clock
1404 MHz+13%
1243 MHz
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
112
144+29%
L1 Cache
672 KB+17%
576 KB
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P3200 Max-QRadeon Pro WX 7130
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro WX 7130 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P3200 Max-Q and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 7130. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Radeon Pro WX 7130 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P3200 Max-QRadeon Pro WX 7130
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro P3200 Max-QRadeon Pro WX 7130
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130).

FeatureQuadro P3200 Max-QRadeon Pro WX 7130
Encoder
6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)
VCE 3.4
Decoder
3rd Gen NVDEC
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7130's 130W — a 53.7% difference. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

FeatureQuadro P3200 Max-QRadeon Pro WX 7130
TDP
75W-42%
130W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
86.7+76%
49.3
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro P3200 Max-Q (2018 vs 2016).

FeatureQuadro P3200 Max-QRadeon Pro WX 7130
MSRP
$1000
Codename
GP104
Ellesmere
Release
February 21 2018
November 10 2016
Ranking
#292
#331

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.