
Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon RX 6300M

Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6300M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is positioned at rank 8 and the Radeon RX 6300M is on rank 98, so the Quadro P3200 Max-Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6300M.
| Insight | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P3200 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3200 Max-Q and Radeon RX 6300M

Quadro P3200 Max-Q
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.

Radeon RX 6300M
The Radeon RX 6300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,421 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q scores 6,500 and the Radeon RX 6300M reaches 6,421 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6300M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300M). Raw compute: 5.032 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300M). Boost clocks: 1404 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,500+1% | 6,421 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+133% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.032 TFLOPS+37% | 3.686 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1404 MHz | 2400 MHz+71% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+133% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 672 KB+163% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 32-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300M) — the Quadro P3200 Max-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+700% | 32-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+50% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6300M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs Navi 24 Media. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 6300M).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) | — |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | Navi 24 Media |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 6300M's 35W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon RX 6300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 35W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 86.7 | 183.5+112% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















