
Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Radeon R9 285
Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon R9 285 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon R9 285 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon R9 285: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅13.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Radeon R9 285 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 190W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Radeon R9 285
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P3200 Max-Q across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌153.3% higher power demand at 190W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon R9 285 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.

Radeon R9 285
The Radeon R9 285 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,680 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q scores 6,500 and the Radeon R9 285 reaches 6,680 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 285 uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285). Raw compute: 5.032 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,500 | 6,680+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.032 TFLOPS+53% | 3.29 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 672 KB+50% | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P3200 Max-Q and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 285. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285) — the Quadro P3200 Max-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 285). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Radeon R9 285).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | UVD 5.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 285's 190W — a 86.8% difference. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-61% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 221mm |
| Height | — | 109mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 86.7+146% | 35.2 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Quadro P3200 Max-Q (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $249 |
| Codename | GP104 | Tonga |
| Release | February 21 2018 | September 2 2014 |
| Ranking | #292 | #365 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














