Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon RX Vega M GH FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon RX Vega M GH: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

2018

Why buy it

✅13.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
✅Radeon RX Vega M GH is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon RX Vega M GH

2018

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P3200 Max-Q across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 13.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX Vega M GH instead at 6,548 vs 6,500, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P3200 Max-Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs Radeon RX Vega M GH Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.

Radeon RX Vega M GH

The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q scores 6,500 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 5.032 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 1404 MHz vs 1190 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon RX Vega M GH
G3D Mark Score	6,500	6,548
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 4.0
Process Node	16 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1792+17%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.032 TFLOPS+38%	3.656 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1404 MHz+18%	1190 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	112+17%	96
L1 Cache	672 KB+75%	384 KB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon RX Vega M GH
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH carries 0 MB. Quadro P3200 Max-Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P3200 Max-Q and 1024-bit on the Radeon RX Vega M GH. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Quadro P3200 Max-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon RX Vega M GH
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM2
Bus Width	256-bit	1024-bit+300%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon RX Vega M GH
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3.

Feature	Quadro P3200 Max-Q	Radeon RX Vega M GH
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)	VCE 3.0
Decoder	3rd Gen NVDEC	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q draws 75W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.