GRID P40-3Q vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P40-3Q vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P40-3Q vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P40-3Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

2018

Why buy it

✅GRID P40-3Q is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID P40-3Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (6,570 vs 6,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID P40-3Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID P40-3Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro P3200 Max-Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID P40-3Q vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P40-3Q

The GRID P40-3Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,570 points. Launch price was $469.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P40-3Q scores 6,570 and the Quadro P3200 Max-Q reaches 6,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-3Q is built on Kepler while the Quadro P3200 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-3Q) vs 5.032 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200 Max-Q).

Feature	GRID P40-3Q	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score	6,570+1%	6,500
Architecture	Kepler	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	1536	1792+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS	5.032 TFLOPS+120%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	128+14%	112
L1 Cache	128 KB	672 KB+425%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.5 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P40-3Q	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-3Q and 256-bit on the Quadro P3200 Max-Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID P40-3Q) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) — the Quadro P3200 Max-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID P40-3Q	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.5 MB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GRID P40-3Q) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GRID P40-3Q	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Tesla NVENC x24 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Decoder: Tesla NVDEC vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-3Q) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q).

Feature	GRID P40-3Q	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Encoder	Tesla NVENC x24	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	Tesla NVDEC	3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,HEVC	H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P40-3Q draws 225W versus the Quadro P3200 Max-Q's 75W — a 100% difference. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-3Q) vs 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GRID P40-3Q	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
TDP	225W	75W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	29.2	86.7+197%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro P3200 Max-Q (2018 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID P40-3Q	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
MSRP	$5699	—
Codename	GK104	GP104
Release	June 28 2013	February 21 2018
Ranking	#628	#292

Search GRID P40-3Q on Amazon

Search Quadro P3200 Max-Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.