
FirePro W8100 vs GRID P40-3Q

FirePro W8100
Popular choices:

GRID P40-3Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro W8100 is positioned at rank 254 and the GRID P40-3Q is on rank 341, so the FirePro W8100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W8100
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-3Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W8100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P40-3Q.
| Insight | FirePro W8100 | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro W8100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro W8100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $200 (vs $5,699), it costs 96% less, resulting in a 2854.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro W8100 | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2854.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,699) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W8100 and GRID P40-3Q

FirePro W8100
The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.

GRID P40-3Q
The GRID P40-3Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,570 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W8100 scores 6,812 and the GRID P40-3Q reaches 6,570 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W8100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the GRID P40-3Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (FirePro W8100) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-3Q). Raw compute: 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-3Q).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,812+4% | 6,570 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+67% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.219 TFLOPS+84% | 2.289 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 640 KB+400% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W8100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P40-3Q has 4 GB. The FirePro W8100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (FirePro W8100) vs 0.5 MB (GRID P40-3Q) — the FirePro W8100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W8100) vs 12 (11_0) (GRID P40-3Q). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100) vs Tesla NVENC x24 (GRID P40-3Q). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs Tesla NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W8100) vs H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-3Q).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | Tesla NVENC x24 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | Tesla NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W8100 draws 220W versus the GRID P40-3Q's 225W — a 2.2% difference. The FirePro W8100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W8100) vs 350W (GRID P40-3Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 87°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-2% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 87°C | 85°C-2% |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0+6% | 29.2 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W8100 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the GRID P40-3Q launched at $5699 and now averages $5699. The FirePro W8100 costs 96.5% less ($5499 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.1 (FirePro W8100) vs 1.2 (GRID P40-3Q) — the FirePro W8100 offers 2741.7% better value. The FirePro W8100 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro W8100 | GRID P40-3Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499-56% | $5699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-96% | $5699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.1+2742% | 1.2 |
| Codename | Hawaii | GK104 |
| Release | June 23 2014 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #361 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












