GRID P40-3Q vs Quadro T1000

GRID P40-3Q

2013Core: 745 MHz
Similar parts
·
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro T1000

2019Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1455 MHz
Similar parts
·

GRID P40-3Q vs Quadro T1000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P40-3Q vs Quadro T1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P40-3Q

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 1324.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,699 MSRPvs$400 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
  • 350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.
  • 71.2% longer card at 267mm vs 156mm.

Quadro T1000

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $5,299 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1310.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
  • GRID P40-3Q is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro T1000 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.
  • Measures 156mm instead of 267mm, a 111mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID P40-3Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (6,570 vs 6,505), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro T1000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro T1000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,299 cheaper on MSRP at $400 vs $5,699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1310.7% (16.3 vs 1.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID P40-3Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID P40-3Q vs Quadro T1000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-3Q

The GRID P40-3Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,570 points. Launch price was $469.

NVIDIA

Quadro T1000

The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P40-3Q scores 6,570 and the Quadro T1000 reaches 6,505 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-3Q is built on Kepler while the Quadro T1000 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm.

FeatureGRID P40-3QQuadro T1000
G3D Mark Score
6,570
6,505
Architecture
Kepler
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P40-3QQuadro T1000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-3Q and 256-bit on the Quadro T1000.

FeatureGRID P40-3QQuadro T1000
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GRID P40-3Q) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGRID P40-3QQuadro T1000
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Tesla NVENC x24 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000). Decoder: Tesla NVDEC vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-3Q) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000).

FeatureGRID P40-3QQuadro T1000
Encoder
Tesla NVENC x24
5th Gen NVENC (Turing)
Decoder
Tesla NVDEC
4th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P40-3Q draws 225W versus the Quadro T1000's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-3Q) vs 350W (Quadro T1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 65°C.

FeatureGRID P40-3QQuadro T1000
TDP
225W
50W-78%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
156mm
Height
111mm
69mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
85°C
65°C-24%
Perf/Watt
29.2
130.1+346%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P40-3Q came in at $5699, while the Quadro T1000 launched at $400. On MSRP, Quadro T1000 was 93% cheaper ($5299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 16.3 (Quadro T1000) — the Quadro T1000 offers 1258.3% better value. The newer card here is Quadro T1000 (2019 vs 2013).

FeatureGRID P40-3QQuadro T1000
MSRP
$5699
$400-93%
Performance per Dollar
1.2
16.3+1258%
Codename
GK104
TU117
Release
June 28 2013
May 27 2019
Ranking
#628
#376

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.