GRID P40-3Q vs T600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P40-3Q vs T600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P40-3Q vs T600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P40-3Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
2749.5% HIGHER MSRP
$5,699 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 32.1 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
❌462.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 40W.
❌71.2% longer card at 267mm vs 156mm.

T600

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,499 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2686.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.1 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 40W instead of 225W, a 185W reduction.
✅Measures 156mm instead of 267mm, a 111mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID P40-3Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.3% in PassMark G3D (6,570 vs 6,425), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

T600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

T600 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,499 cheaper on MSRP at $200 vs $5,699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2686.6% (32.1 vs 1.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID P40-3Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID P40-3Q vs T600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P40-3Q

The GRID P40-3Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,570 points. Launch price was $469.

T600

The T600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,425 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P40-3Q scores 6,570 and the T600 reaches 6,425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-3Q is built on Kepler while the T600 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 640 (T600). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-3Q) vs 1.709 TFLOPS (T600).

Feature	GRID P40-3Q	T600
G3D Mark Score	6,570+2%	6,425
Architecture	Kepler	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1536+140%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS+34%	1.709 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128+220%	40
L1 Cache	128 KB	640 KB+400%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P40-3Q	T600
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-3Q and 128-bit on the T600. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID P40-3Q) vs 1 MB (T600) — the T600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID P40-3Q	T600
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GRID P40-3Q) vs 12 (12_1) (T600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GRID P40-3Q	T600
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Tesla NVENC x24 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Turing) (T600). Decoder: Tesla NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-3Q) vs H.264,HEVC (T600).

Feature	GRID P40-3Q	T600
Encoder	Tesla NVENC x24	7th Gen NVENC (Turing)
Decoder	Tesla NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,HEVC	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P40-3Q draws 225W versus the T600's 40W — a 139.6% difference. The T600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-3Q) vs 350W (T600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 65°C.

Feature	GRID P40-3Q	T600
TDP	225W	40W-82%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	156mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	85°C	65°C-24%
Perf/Watt	29.2	160.6+450%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P40-3Q came in at $5699, while the T600 launched at $200. On MSRP, T600 was 96.5% cheaper ($5499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 32.1 (T600) — the T600 offers 2575% better value. The newer card here is T600 (2021 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID P40-3Q	T600
MSRP	$5699	$200-96%
Performance per Dollar	1.2	32.1+2575%
Codename	GK104	TU117
Release	June 28 2013	May 6 2021
Ranking	#628	#378

Search GRID P40-3Q on Amazon

Search T600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.