GRID P40-3Q vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P40-3Q vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P40-3Q vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P40-3Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌462.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 40W.

Quadro T2000 Max-Q

2019

Why buy it

✅GRID P40-3Q is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro T2000 Max-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 40W instead of 225W, a 185W reduction.
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro T2000 Max-Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5.9% in PassMark G3D (6,959 vs 6,570), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro T2000 Max-Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID P40-3Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID P40-3Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro T2000 Max-Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID P40-3Q vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P40-3Q

The GRID P40-3Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,570 points. Launch price was $469.

Quadro T2000 Max-Q

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GRID P40-3Q scores 6,570 versus the Quadro T2000 Max-Q's 6,959 — the Quadro T2000 Max-Q leads by 5.9%. The GRID P40-3Q is built on Kepler while the Quadro T2000 Max-Q uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 1,024 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-3Q) vs 3.318 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 Max-Q).

Feature	GRID P40-3Q	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score	6,570	6,959+6%
Architecture	Kepler	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1536+50%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.289 TFLOPS	3.318 TFLOPS+45%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128+100%	64
L1 Cache	0.13 MB	1 MB+669%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P40-3Q	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-3Q and 256-bit on the Quadro T2000 Max-Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID P40-3Q) vs 1 MB (Quadro T2000 Max-Q) — the Quadro T2000 Max-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID P40-3Q	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GRID P40-3Q) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GRID P40-3Q	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Tesla NVENC x24 (GRID P40-3Q) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Decoder: Tesla NVDEC vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-3Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q).

Feature	GRID P40-3Q	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Encoder	Tesla NVENC x24	NVENC 7.0
Decoder	Tesla NVDEC	PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs	H.264,HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P40-3Q draws 225W versus the Quadro T2000 Max-Q's 40W — a 139.6% difference. The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-3Q) vs 350W (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GRID P40-3Q	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
TDP	225W	40W-82%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	29.2	174.0+496%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro T2000 Max-Q (2019 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID P40-3Q	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
MSRP	$5699	—
Codename	GK104	TU117
Release	June 28 2013	May 27 2019
Ranking	#628	#357

Search GRID P40-3Q on Amazon

Search Quadro T2000 Max-Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.