GRID P40-3Q vs Radeon Pro 5500M

GRID P40-3Q

2013Core: 745 MHz
Similar parts
·
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 5500M

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1450 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GRID P40-3Q vs Radeon Pro 5500M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P40-3Q vs Radeon Pro 5500M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P40-3Q

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 164.7% higher power demand at 225W vs 85W.

Radeon Pro 5500M

2019

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 85W instead of 225W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro 5500M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (6,730 vs 6,570), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro 5500M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P40-3Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID P40-3Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 5500M has the stronger long-term case.

GRID P40-3Q vs Radeon Pro 5500M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-3Q

The GRID P40-3Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,570 points. Launch price was $469.

AMD

Radeon Pro 5500M

The Radeon Pro 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,730 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P40-3Q scores 6,570 and the Radeon Pro 5500M reaches 6,730 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-3Q is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500M). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-3Q) vs 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500M).

FeatureGRID P40-3QRadeon Pro 5500M
G3D Mark Score
6,570
6,730+2%
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1536
1536
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.289 TFLOPS
4.454 TFLOPS+95%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128+33%
96
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P40-3QRadeon Pro 5500M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID P40-3Q has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5500M carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro 5500M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-3Q and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5500M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID P40-3Q) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5500M) — the Radeon Pro 5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID P40-3QRadeon Pro 5500M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GRID P40-3Q) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGRID P40-3QRadeon Pro 5500M
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Tesla NVENC x24 (GRID P40-3Q) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500M). Decoder: Tesla NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-3Q) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5500M).

FeatureGRID P40-3QRadeon Pro 5500M
Encoder
Tesla NVENC x24
VCN 2.0
Decoder
Tesla NVDEC
VCN 2.0
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P40-3Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 5500M's 85W — a 90.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-3Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.

FeatureGRID P40-3QRadeon Pro 5500M
TDP
225W
85W-62%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
85
Perf/Watt
29.2
79.2+171%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro 5500M (2019 vs 2013).

FeatureGRID P40-3QRadeon Pro 5500M
MSRP
$5699
Codename
GK104
Navi 14
Release
June 28 2013
November 13 2019
Ranking
#628
#363

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.