Quadro P3000 vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P3000 vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P3000 vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P3000

2016

Why buy it

✅42.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

2018

Why buy it

✅Quadro P3000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P3000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 42.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P3200 Max-Q instead at 6,500 vs 6,384, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P3000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro P3000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro P3200 Max-Q has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro P3000 vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P3000

The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.

Quadro P3200 Max-Q

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P3000 scores 6,384 and the Quadro P3200 Max-Q reaches 6,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3000 is built on Pascal while the Quadro P3200 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P3000) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000) vs 5.032 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1404 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P3000	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score	6,384	6,500+2%
Architecture	Pascal	Pascal
Process Node	16 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	3840+114%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.63 TFLOPS+151%	5.032 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1645 MHz+17%	1404 MHz
ROPs	96+50%	64
TMUs	240+114%	112
L1 Cache	1.4 MB+112%	0.66 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+100%	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P3000	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P3000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3200 Max-Q carries 4 GB. Quadro P3000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P3000 and 256-bit on the Quadro P3200 Max-Q. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P3000) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) — the Quadro P3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P3000	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+100%	1.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3000) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P3000	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3000) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P3000) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q).

Feature	Quadro P3000	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	3rd Gen NVDEC	3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,HEVC,VP9,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P3000 draws 250W versus the Quadro P3200 Max-Q's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3000) vs 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Quadro P3000	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
TDP	250W	75W-70%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	25.5	86.7+240%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro P3200 Max-Q (2018 vs 2016).

Feature	Quadro P3000	Quadro P3200 Max-Q
MSRP	$600	—
Codename	GP102	GP104
Release	October 1 2016	February 21 2018
Ranking	#141	#292

Search Quadro P3000 on Amazon

Search Quadro P3200 Max-Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.