Quadro P3000 vs T600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P3000 is positioned at rank 135 and the T600 is on rank 36, so the T600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3000

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

97%

#120

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1388%

#135

Quadro P3000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

100%

#136

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $200

100%

#139

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $120

94%

#140

Radeon Pro V520

MSRP: $800|Avg: $300

94%

#141

Quadro M5500

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

93%

#142

Quadro K1200

MSRP: $300|Avg: $184

93%

#143

Quadro P400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $60

92%

#144

Radeon Pro WX 7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $180

91%

#145

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

90%

#146

Radeon Sky 500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

89%

#147

Quadro M5000

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

89%

#148

Radeon Pro WX 4100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $85

87%

#149

Quadro P4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $819|Avg: $290

86%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar T600

#16

Radeon PRO W7500

MSRP: $429|Avg: $401

96%

#18

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340

95%

#19

RTX A2000 12GB

MSRP: $449|Avg: $380

95%

#20

Radeon Pro Vega 56

MSRP: $399|Avg: $60

94%

#21

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

460%

#21

RTX A2000

MSRP: $450|Avg: $320

93%

#36

T600

MSRP: $200|Avg: $180

100%

#43

P106-100

MSRP: $224|Avg: $30

92%

#48

Quadro K3100M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $400

89%

#50

Quadro K5000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $509

87%

#51

Radeon PRO W6300

MSRP: $200|Avg: $150

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The T600 uses modern memory architecture. The T600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P3000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The T600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P3000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro P3000	T600
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+50%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro P3000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $180 for the T600, it costs 56% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 123.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro P3000	T600
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+123.6%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($80)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($180)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P3000 Benchmark Check

T600 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3000 and T600

Quadro P3000

The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.

T600

The T600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,425 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P3000 scores 6,384 and the T600 reaches 6,425 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3000 is built on Pascal while the T600 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P3000) vs 640 (T600). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000) vs 1.709 TFLOPS (T600). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1335 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P3000	T600
G3D Mark Score	6,384	6,425
Architecture	Pascal	Turing
Process Node	16 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	3840+500%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.63 TFLOPS+639%	1.709 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1645 MHz+23%	1335 MHz
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	240+500%	40
L1 Cache	1.4 MB+122%	0.63 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P3000	T600
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P3000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the T600 has 4 GB. The Quadro P3000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P3000) vs 1 MB (T600) — the Quadro P3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P3000	T600
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3000) vs 12 (12_1) (T600). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P3000	T600
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3000) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Turing) (T600). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P3000) vs H.264,HEVC (T600).

Feature	Quadro P3000	T600
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)	7th Gen NVENC (Turing)
Decoder	3rd Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P3000 draws 250W versus the T600's 40W — a 144.8% difference. The T600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3000) vs 350W (T600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.

Feature	Quadro P3000	T600
TDP	250W	40W-84%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	156mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	80°C	65°C-19%
Perf/Watt	25.5	160.6+530%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P3000 launched at $600 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the T600 launched at $200 and now averages $180. The Quadro P3000 costs 55.6% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 79.8 (Quadro P3000) vs 35.7 (T600) — the Quadro P3000 offers 123.5% better value. The T600 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).