Quadro P3000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P3000 is positioned at rank #135 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3000

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

97%

#120

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1388%

#135

Quadro P3000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

100%

#136

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $200

100%

#139

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $120

94%

#140

Radeon Pro V520

MSRP: $800|Avg: $300

94%

#141

Quadro M5500

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

93%

#142

Quadro K1200

MSRP: $300|Avg: $184

93%

#143

Quadro P400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $60

92%

#144

Radeon Pro WX 7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $180

91%

#145

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

90%

#146

Radeon Sky 500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

89%

#147

Quadro M5000

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

89%

#148

Radeon Pro WX 4100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $85

87%

#149

Quadro P4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $819|Avg: $290

86%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P3000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti.

Insight	Quadro P3000	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+50%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $65 (vs $80), it costs 19% less, resulting in a 22.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro P3000	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+22.4%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80)	✅More affordable ($65)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P3000 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3000 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Quadro P3000

The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P3000 scores 6,384 and the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti reaches 6,350 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3000 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti uses Pascal, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P3000) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000) vs 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1392 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P3000	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
G3D Mark Score	6,384	6,350
Architecture	Pascal	Pascal
Process Node	16 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	3840+400%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.63 TFLOPS+491%	2.138 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1645 MHz+18%	1392 MHz
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	240+400%	48
L1 Cache	1.4 MB+400%	0.28 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P3000	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P3000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti has 4 GB. The Quadro P3000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P3000) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) — the Quadro P3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P3000	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3000) vs 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro P3000	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3000) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P3000) vs H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti).

Feature	Quadro P3000	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)	NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder	3rd Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 3rd Gen
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P3000 draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti's 70W — a 112.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3000) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro P3000	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
TDP	250W	70W-72%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	211mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	25.5	90.7+256%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P3000 launched at $600 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti launched at $140 and now averages $65. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti costs 18.8% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 79.8 (Quadro P3000) vs 97.7 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 22.4% better value.