Quadro P3000 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P3000 is positioned at rank 135 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is on rank 5, so the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3000

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

97%

#120

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1388%

#135

Quadro P3000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

100%

#136

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $200

100%

#139

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $120

94%

#140

Radeon Pro V520

MSRP: $800|Avg: $300

94%

#141

Quadro M5500

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

93%

#142

Quadro K1200

MSRP: $300|Avg: $184

93%

#143

Quadro P400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $60

92%

#144

Radeon Pro WX 7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $180

91%

#145

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

90%

#146

Radeon Sky 500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

89%

#147

Quadro M5000

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

89%

#148

Radeon Pro WX 4100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $85

87%

#149

Quadro P4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $819|Avg: $290

86%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

#5

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#6

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

100%

#8

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

90%

#9

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

90%

#13

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

82%

#14

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

81%

#18

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

80%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P3000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P3000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.

Insight	Quadro P3000	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+50%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P3000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P3000 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3000 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

Quadro P3000

The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,314 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P3000 scores 6,384 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q reaches 6,314 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3000 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P3000) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1125 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P3000	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score	6,384+1%	6,314
Architecture	Pascal	Turing
Process Node	16 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	3840+275%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.63 TFLOPS+448%	2.304 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1645 MHz+46%	1125 MHz
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	240+275%	64
L1 Cache	1.4 MB+40%	1 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P3000	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P3000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has 4 GB. The Quadro P3000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P3000) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) — the Quadro P3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P3000	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3000) vs 12 (11_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P3000	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_1)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3000) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P3000) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q).

Feature	Quadro P3000	GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)	NVENC (Turing)
Decoder	3rd Gen NVDEC	NVDEC (4th Gen)
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P3000 draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q's 30W — a 157.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3000) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.