Quadro P3000 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130

CPU

GPU

Quadro P3000

2016Core: 1506 MHzBoost: 1645 MHz

Similar parts

··

Buy on Amazon

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016Core: 1188 MHzBoost: 1243 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Quadro P3000 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 Performance Spectrum

Quadro P3000

6 GB 250

6,384

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

Radeon Pro WX 7130

8 GB 130

6,406

+0.3%

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

Radeon R9 M395

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P3000 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P3000 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P3000

2016

Why buy it

✅23.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 66.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.6 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.

Radeon Pro WX 7130

2016

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
66.7% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P3000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro WX 7130 instead at 6,406 vs 6,384, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P3000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P3000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $400 cheaper on MSRP at $600 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 66.1% (10.6 vs 6.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro P3000 vs Radeon Pro WX 7130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P3000

The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.

Radeon Pro WX 7130

The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,406 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P3000 scores 6,384 and the Radeon Pro WX 7130 reaches 6,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P3000) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1243 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P3000	Radeon Pro WX 7130
G3D Mark Score	6,384	6,406
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 4.0
Process Node	16 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	3840+67%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.63 TFLOPS+120%	5.728 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1645 MHz+32%	1243 MHz
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	240+67%	144
L1 Cache	1.4 MB+150%	0.56 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+50%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P3000	Radeon Pro WX 7130
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P3000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro WX 7130 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P3000 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 7130. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P3000) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Quadro P3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P3000	Radeon Pro WX 7130
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+50%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3000) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P3000	Radeon Pro WX 7130
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3000) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P3000) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7130).

Feature	Quadro P3000	Radeon Pro WX 7130
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC (Pascal)	VCE 3.4
Decoder	3rd Gen NVDEC	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P3000 draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7130's 130W — a 63.2% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 7130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7130). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Quadro P3000	Radeon Pro WX 7130
TDP	250W	130W-48%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	25.5	49.3+93%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P3000 came in at $600, while the Radeon Pro WX 7130 launched at $1000. On MSRP, Quadro P3000 was 40% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.6 (Quadro P3000) vs 6.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7130) — the Quadro P3000 offers 65.6% better value.

Feature	Quadro P3000	Radeon Pro WX 7130
MSRP	$600-40%	$1000
Performance per Dollar	10.6+66%	6.4
Codename	GP102	Ellesmere
Release	October 1 2016	November 10 2016
Ranking	#141	#331

Search Quadro P3000 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 7130 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.