
GRID P40-3Q

Quadro P3000
GRID P40-3Q vs Quadro P3000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID P40-3Q vs Quadro P3000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID P40-3Q vs Quadro P3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID P40-3Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌849.8% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.2 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Quadro P3000
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,099 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 822.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.6 vs 1.2 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P40-3Q vs Quadro P3000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P40-3Q
The GRID P40-3Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,570 points. Launch price was $469.

Quadro P3000
The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-3Q scores 6,570 and the Quadro P3000 reaches 6,384 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-3Q is built on Kepler while the Quadro P3000 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 3,840 (Quadro P3000). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-3Q) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000).
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,570+3% | 6,384 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 3840+150% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS | 12.63 TFLOPS+452% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 128 | 240+88% |
| L1 Cache | 0.13 MB | 1.4 MB+977% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P40-3Q has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3000 carries 6 GB. Quadro P3000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-3Q and 256-bit on the Quadro P3000. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID P40-3Q) vs 3 MB (Quadro P3000) — the Quadro P3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GRID P40-3Q) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Tesla NVENC x24 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3000). Decoder: Tesla NVDEC vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-3Q) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P3000).
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Tesla NVENC x24 | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | Tesla NVDEC | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-3Q draws 225W versus the Quadro P3000's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID P40-3Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-3Q) vs 350W (Quadro P3000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-10% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 29.2+15% | 25.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID P40-3Q came in at $5699, while the Quadro P3000 launched at $600. On MSRP, Quadro P3000 was 89.5% cheaper ($5099 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.2 (GRID P40-3Q) vs 10.6 (Quadro P3000) — the Quadro P3000 offers 783.3% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P3000 (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID P40-3Q | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5699 | $600-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 10.6+783% |
| Codename | GK104 | GP102 |
| Release | June 28 2013 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #628 | #141 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














