
Quadro P3000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH

Quadro P3000
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega M GH
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P3000 is positioned at rank #135 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega M GH uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega M GH likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P3000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P3000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro P3000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX Vega M GH remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH

Quadro P3000
The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.

Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P3000 scores 6,384 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P3000) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1190 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,384 | 6,548+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+150% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.63 TFLOPS+245% | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz+38% | 1190 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+150% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+268% | 0.38 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P3000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH has 0 MB. The Quadro P3000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 1024-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P3000) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Quadro P3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 1024-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3000) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3000) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P3000 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3000) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 100W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.5 | 65.5+157% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P3000 launched at $600 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon RX Vega M GH costs 100+% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 79.8 (Quadro P3000) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 79.8 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP102 | Polaris 22 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #141 | #373 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















