Quadro P3000
Radeon RX Vega M GH
Quadro P3000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P3000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P3000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P3000
2016Why buy it
- ✅61.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon RX Vega M GH is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P3000 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
Radeon RX Vega M GH
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P3000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro P3000
The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P3000 scores 6,384 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P3000) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1190 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,384 | 6,548+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+150% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.63 TFLOPS+245% | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz+38% | 1190 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+150% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+268% | 0.38 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P3000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH carries 0 MB. Quadro P3000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P3000 and 1024-bit on the Radeon RX Vega M GH. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P3000) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Quadro P3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 1024-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P3000) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P3000) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P3000 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3000) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 100W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.5 | 65.5+157% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro P3000 came in at $600, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega M GH was 100+% cheaper ($600 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.6 (Quadro P3000) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega M GH (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP102 | Polaris 22 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #141 | #373 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P3000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH
