
Quadro P3000 vs Radeon Pro 570

Quadro P3000
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P3000 is positioned at rank 135 and the Radeon Pro 570 is on rank 78, so the Radeon Pro 570 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P3000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 570.
| Insight | Quadro P3000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P3000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro P3000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $100), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 25.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P3000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+25.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($80) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3000 and Radeon Pro 570

Quadro P3000
The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.

Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P3000 scores 6,384 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P3000) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1105 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,384 | 6,337 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+114% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.63 TFLOPS+219% | 3.96 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz+49% | 1105 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+114% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+218% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P3000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 570 has 4 GB. The Quadro P3000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P3000) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) — the Quadro P3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P3000 draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 70.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 120W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.5 | 52.8+107% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P3000 launched at $600 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300 and now averages $100. The Quadro P3000 costs 20% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 79.8 (Quadro P3000) vs 63.4 (Radeon Pro 570) — the Quadro P3000 offers 25.9% better value. The Radeon Pro 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P3000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $300-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80-20% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 79.8+26% | 63.4 |
| Codename | GP102 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #141 | #382 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















