Radeon Pro 570 vs GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon Pro 570

120

6,337

+0.4%

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U

Radeon R9 M395

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

50

6,309

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 570 is positioned at rank 78 and the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is on rank 65, so the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 570

#38

Radeon PRO W6600X

MSRP: $699|Avg: $699

89%

#41

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

85%

#42

Radeon Pro W5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $300

85%

#43

Radeon Pro W5700X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

83%

#44

RTX A4000

MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111

83%

#45

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

MSRP: $849|Avg: $748

80%

#46

Quadro RTX 4000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $220

79%

#63

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

699%

#78

Radeon Pro 570

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

100%

#80

T400

MSRP: $180|Avg: $179

95%

#86

Quadro P3200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $63

81%

#89

Quadro P2000

MSRP: $425|Avg: $190

78%

#90

Quadro T1000

MSRP: $400|Avg: $425

77%

#93

Radeon Pro 580

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

73%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

#19

Radeon RX 5600

MSRP: $229|Avg: $150

98%

#22

Radeon RX 7700

MSRP: $449|Avg: $399

94%

#55

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

206%

#57

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

187%

#58

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

187%

#62

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

170%

#63

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

169%

#65

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

100%

#66

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

100%

#68

GeForce GTX 850M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

97%

#78

Radeon HD 8970M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $170

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro 570 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro 570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design.

Insight	Radeon Pro 570	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon Pro 570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $100 (vs $100), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 0.4% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design.

Insight	Radeon Pro 570	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+0.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro 570 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 570 and GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

Radeon Pro 570

The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,309 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 570 scores 6,337 and the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design reaches 6,309 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 570 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570) vs 2.458 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1105 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro 570	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score	6,337	6,309
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Turing
Process Node	14 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1792+75%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.96 TFLOPS+61%	2.458 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1105 MHz	1200 MHz+9%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	112+75%	64
L1 Cache	0.44 MB	1 MB+127%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro 570	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) — the Radeon Pro 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro 570	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 570 draws 120W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design's 50W — a 82.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 570) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon Pro 570	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
TDP	120W	50W-58%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	52.8	126.2+139%

💰

Value Analysis

Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 63.4 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 63.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) — the Radeon Pro 570 offers 0.5% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).