
Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:

Quadro P3000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 570 is positioned at rank 78 and the Quadro P3000 is on rank 135, so the Radeon Pro 570 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 570
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P3000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 570.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 570 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P3000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro P3000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $80 (vs $100), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 25.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 570 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+25.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 570 and Quadro P3000

Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

Quadro P3000
The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 570 scores 6,337 and the Quadro P3000 reaches 6,384 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 570 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro P3000 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 3,840 (Quadro P3000). Raw compute: 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570) vs 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000). Boost clocks: 1105 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,337 | 6,384 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 3840+114% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.96 TFLOPS | 12.63 TFLOPS+219% |
| Boost Clock | 1105 MHz | 1645 MHz+49% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 112 | 240+114% |
| L1 Cache | 0.44 MB | 1.4 MB+218% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro 570 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3000 has 6 GB. The Quadro P3000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) vs 3 MB (Quadro P3000) — the Quadro P3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 570 draws 120W versus the Quadro P3000's 250W — a 70.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 570) vs 350W (Quadro P3000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-52% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8+107% | 25.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Quadro P3000 launched at $600 and now averages $80. The Quadro P3000 costs 20% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 63.4 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 79.8 (Quadro P3000) — the Quadro P3000 offers 25.9% better value. The Radeon Pro 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Quadro P3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-50% | $600 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $80-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.4 | 79.8+26% |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | GP102 |
| Release | June 5 2017 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #382 | #141 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















