
Radeon Pro 570 vs Quadro P3000 (móvel)

Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:

Quadro P3000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro 570 is positioned at rank 78 and the Quadro P3000 (móvel) is on rank 135, so the Radeon Pro 570 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 570
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3000 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 570.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 570 | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro 570 holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $200), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 98.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro 570 | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+98.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($100) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 570 and Quadro P3000 (móvel)

Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

Quadro P3000 (móvel)
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1088 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,385 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 570 scores 6,337 and the Quadro P3000 (móvel) reaches 6,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 570 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro P3000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 1,280 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570) vs 3.11 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1105 MHz vs 1215 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,337 | 6,385 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+40% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.96 TFLOPS+27% | 3.11 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1105 MHz | 1215 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 112+40% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 480 KB+7% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) — the Radeon Pro 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 570 draws 120W versus the Quadro P3000 (móvel)'s 75W — a 46.2% difference. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 570) vs 350W (Quadro P3000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 75W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8 | 85.1+61% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the Quadro P3000 (móvel) launched at $600 and now averages $200. The Radeon Pro 570 costs 50% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 63.4 (Radeon Pro 570) vs 31.9 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) — the Radeon Pro 570 offers 98.7% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 570 | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-50% | $600 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-50% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.4+99% | 31.9 |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | GP104 |
| Release | June 5 2017 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #382 | #380 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















