Radeon Pro 5700
RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Radeon Pro 5700 vs RTX A2000 Embedded GPU Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro 5700 vs RTX A2000 Embedded GPU FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro 5700 vs RTX A2000 Embedded GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅5.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
- ❌225.6% longer card at 267mm vs 82mm.
RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 267mm, a 185mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 5700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro 5700 vs RTX A2000 Embedded GPU Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon Pro 5700
The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.
RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 607 MHz to 1177 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,117 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 5700 scores 11,469 and the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU reaches 11,117 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 2,560 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 6.026 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1177 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,469+3% | 11,117 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.221 TFLOPS+3% | 6.026 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1350 MHz+15% | 1177 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+80% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 5700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5700 and 128-bit on the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 2 MB (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 5700 draws 130W versus the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU's 35W — a 115.2% difference. The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 500W (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 35W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 82mm |
| Height | 111mm | 4mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2 | 317.6+260% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX A2000 Embedded GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 5700 | RTX A2000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | — |
| Codename | Navi 10 | GA107S |
| Release | August 4 2020 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #238 | #243 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 5700 and RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
