G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro 5700

2020

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
❌225.6% longer card at 267mm vs 82mm.

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
✅Measures 82mm instead of 267mm, a 185mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Radeon Pro 5700

2020

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 130W, a 95W reduction.
✅Measures 82mm instead of 267mm, a 185mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌271.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 35W.
❌225.6% longer card at 267mm vs 82mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro 5700 better than RTX A2000 Embedded GPU?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 11,469 vs 11,117 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Pro 5700 is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2020 and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro 5700 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $799 MSRP. Radeon Pro 5700 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon Pro 5700 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $799 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 3.2% higher G3D Mark. RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is the newer 2022 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (35W vs 130W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does RTX A2000 Embedded GPU make more sense than Radeon Pro 5700?

Yes. RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (35W vs 130W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro 5700. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro 5700 currently gives you 3.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro 5700 Benchmark Check

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon Pro 5700	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	119 FPS	105 FPS
medium	105 FPS	88 FPS
high	88 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	49 FPS
1440p
low	108 FPS	91 FPS
medium	90 FPS	75 FPS
high	71 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	36 FPS
4K
low	56 FPS	36 FPS
medium	50 FPS	33 FPS
high	32 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	17 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 5700 Open RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon Pro 5700	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	215 FPS	124 FPS
medium	180 FPS	100 FPS
high	133 FPS	80 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	61 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	90 FPS
medium	120 FPS	70 FPS
high	92 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	44 FPS
4K
low	76 FPS	55 FPS
medium	65 FPS	43 FPS
high	53 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	26 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 5700 Open RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon Pro 5700	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	516 FPS	500 FPS
medium	413 FPS	400 FPS
high	344 FPS	334 FPS
ultra	258 FPS	250 FPS
1440p
low	387 FPS	375 FPS
medium	310 FPS	300 FPS
high	258 FPS	250 FPS
ultra	194 FPS	188 FPS
4K
low	258 FPS	250 FPS
medium	206 FPS	200 FPS
high	172 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	129 FPS	125 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 5700 Open RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon Pro 5700	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
1080p
low	378 FPS	229 FPS
medium	325 FPS	196 FPS
high	275 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	216 FPS	133 FPS
1440p
low	301 FPS	176 FPS
medium	262 FPS	153 FPS
high	206 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	157 FPS	98 FPS
4K
low	162 FPS	99 FPS
medium	130 FPS	78 FPS
high	118 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	51 FPS

Open Radeon Pro 5700 Open RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 5700 and RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

Radeon Pro 5700

The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.

RTX A2000 Embedded GPU

The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 607 MHz to 1177 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,117 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro 5700 scores 11,469 and the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU reaches 11,117 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 2,560 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 6.026 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1350 MHz vs 1177 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5700	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score	11,469+3%	11,117
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Ampere
Process Node	7 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	2304	2560+11%
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.221 TFLOPS+3%	6.026 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1350 MHz+15%	1177 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	144+80%	80
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5700	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 2 MB (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5700	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5700	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+50%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU).

Feature	Radeon Pro 5700	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
Encoder	VCN 2.0	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	VCN 2.0	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro 5700 draws 130W versus the RTX A2000 Embedded GPU's 35W — a 115.2% difference. The RTX A2000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro 5700) vs 500W (RTX A2000 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro 5700	RTX A2000 Embedded GPU
TDP	130W	35W-73%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	82mm
Height	111mm	4mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	88.2	317.6+260%