Radeon Pro Duo vs Arc A530M
Radeon Pro Duo
Popular choices:
Arc A530M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro Duo is positioned at rank 200 and the Arc A530M is on rank 243, so the Radeon Pro Duo offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Duo
Performance Per Dollar Arc A530M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc A530M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The Arc A530M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro Duo lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro Duo is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A530M.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Duo | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro Duo remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Duo and Arc A530M
Radeon Pro Duo
The Radeon Pro Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,299 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Arc A530M
The Arc A530M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 1 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,013 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Duo scores 8,299 and the Arc A530M reaches 8,013 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Duo is built on GCN 3.0 while the Arc A530M uses Generation 12.7, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 1,536 (Arc A530M). Raw compute: 8.192 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 3.994 TFLOPS (Arc A530M). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,299+4% | 8,013 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 ×2+167% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.192 TFLOPS ×2+105% | 3.994 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1300 MHz+30% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 256 ×2+167% | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Duo comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A530M has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro Duo offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 8 MB (Arc A530M) — the Arc A530M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 12.2 (Arc A530M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A530M). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro Duo) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A530M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Duo draws 350W versus the Arc A530M's 65W — a 137.3% difference. The Arc A530M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 500W (Arc A530M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 65W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 23.7 | 123.3+420% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A530M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $799 | — |
| Codename | Capsaicin | DG2-256 |
| Release | April 26 2016 | August 1 2023 |
| Ranking | #309 | #317 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro Duo and Arc A530M
