Radeon Pro Duo vs GeForce GTX Titan
Radeon Pro Duo
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX Titan
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro Duo is positioned at rank #200 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Duo
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro Duo is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX Titan.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Duo | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX Titan offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX Titan holds the technical lead. Priced at $70 (vs $799), it costs 91% less, resulting in a 1025.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Duo | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1025.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($799) | ✅More affordable ($70) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Duo and GeForce GTX Titan
Radeon Pro Duo
The Radeon Pro Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,299 points. Launch price was $1,499.
GeForce GTX Titan
The GeForce GTX Titan is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 19 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,181 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Duo scores 8,299 and the GeForce GTX Titan reaches 8,181 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Duo is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce GTX Titan uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 2,688 (GeForce GTX Titan). Raw compute: 8.192 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 4.709 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX Titan). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,299+1% | 8,181 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 ×2+52% | 2688 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.192 TFLOPS ×2+74% | 4.709 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz+14% | 876 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 ×2+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 256 ×2+14% | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+355% | 0.22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Duo comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX Titan has 6 GB. The Radeon Pro Duo offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX Titan) — the Radeon Pro Duo has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 12 (GeForce GTX Titan). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1+10% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX Titan). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro Duo) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX Titan).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Duo draws 350W versus the GeForce GTX Titan's 250W — a 33.3% difference. The GeForce GTX Titan is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 600W (GeForce GTX Titan). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 23.7 | 32.7+38% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Duo launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $799, while the GeForce GTX Titan launched at $999 and now averages $70. The GeForce GTX Titan costs 91.2% less ($729 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.4 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 116.9 (GeForce GTX Titan) — the GeForce GTX Titan offers 1024% better value. The Radeon Pro Duo is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $999-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $799 | $70-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.4 | 116.9+1024% |
| Codename | Capsaicin | GK110 |
| Release | April 26 2016 | February 19 2013 |
| Ranking | #309 | #311 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro Duo and GeForce GTX Titan
