Radeon Pro Duo vs Quadro P3200
Radeon Pro Duo
Popular choices:
Quadro P3200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro Duo is positioned at rank 200 and the Quadro P3200 is on rank 86, so the Quadro P3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Duo
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P3200 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P3200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro Duo lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P3200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro Duo offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Duo | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P3200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $63 versus $799 for the Radeon Pro Duo, it costs 92% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1210.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Duo | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1210.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($799) | ✅More affordable ($63) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Duo and Quadro P3200
Radeon Pro Duo
The Radeon Pro Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,299 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Quadro P3200
The Quadro P3200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1328 MHz to 1543 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,578 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Duo scores 8,299 and the Quadro P3200 reaches 8,578 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Duo is built on GCN 3.0 while the Quadro P3200 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200). Raw compute: 8.192 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1543 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,299 | 8,578+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 ×2+129% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.192 TFLOPS ×2+48% | 5.53 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1543 MHz+54% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 64 |
| TMUs | 256 ×2+129% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+52% | 0.66 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Duo comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3200 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro Duo offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200) — the Radeon Pro Duo has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 12 (Quadro P3200). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P3200). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro Duo) vs H.265,H.264 (Quadro P3200).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Duo draws 350W versus the Quadro P3200's 75W — a 129.4% difference. The Quadro P3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 500W (Quadro P3200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 350W | 75W-79% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 23.7 | 114.4+383% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Duo launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $799, while the Quadro P3200 launched at $500 and now averages $63. The Quadro P3200 costs 92.1% less ($736 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.4 (Radeon Pro Duo) vs 136.2 (Quadro P3200) — the Quadro P3200 offers 1209.6% better value. The Quadro P3200 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Duo | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $500-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $799 | $63-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.4 | 136.2+1210% |
| Codename | Capsaicin | GP104 |
| Release | April 26 2016 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #309 | #304 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro Duo and Quadro P3200
