Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs Radeon RX 7400

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 56

2017Core: 1138 MHzBoost: 1250 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX 7400

2025Core: 1452 MHzBoost: 2300 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro Vega 56

2017

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7400 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 100.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $399 MSRPvs$199 MSRP

Radeon RX 7400

2025

Why buy it

  • 30.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $200 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 93% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 7400 better than Radeon Pro Vega 56?
Yes. Radeon RX 7400 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon RX 7400 averages 30.7% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 11,654 vs 12,104 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 7400 is a 2025 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a 2017 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 7400 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2017, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of Unknown, better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 6nm process instead of 14nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon RX 7400 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Radeon RX 7400 is about $200 cheaper on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and you are getting 30.7% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (11,654 vs 12,104). It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 93%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.
Is Radeon Pro Vega 56 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon Pro Vega 56 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $399 MSRP, even if Radeon RX 7400 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 7400
1080p
low95 FPS163 FPS
medium82 FPS145 FPS
high70 FPS127 FPS
ultra48 FPS108 FPS
1440p
low79 FPS137 FPS
medium68 FPS111 FPS
high53 FPS98 FPS
ultra36 FPS88 FPS
4K
low31 FPS82 FPS
medium28 FPS69 FPS
high22 FPS54 FPS
ultra19 FPS47 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 7400
1080p
low267 FPS337 FPS
medium227 FPS281 FPS
high178 FPS221 FPS
ultra144 FPS166 FPS
1440p
low189 FPS213 FPS
medium162 FPS178 FPS
high132 FPS141 FPS
ultra105 FPS107 FPS
4K
low100 FPS98 FPS
medium83 FPS81 FPS
high71 FPS68 FPS
ultra55 FPS49 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 7400
1080p
low485 FPS524 FPS
medium417 FPS420 FPS
high363 FPS350 FPS
ultra272 FPS262 FPS
1440p
low386 FPS393 FPS
medium327 FPS315 FPS
high272 FPS262 FPS
ultra204 FPS197 FPS
4K
low245 FPS262 FPS
medium202 FPS210 FPS
high160 FPS175 FPS
ultra123 FPS131 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 7400
1080p
low176 FPS508 FPS
medium144 FPS420 FPS
high123 FPS350 FPS
ultra104 FPS262 FPS
1440p
low127 FPS393 FPS
medium107 FPS315 FPS
high92 FPS262 FPS
ultra78 FPS197 FPS
4K
low73 FPS262 FPS
medium61 FPS210 FPS
high47 FPS175 FPS
ultra37 FPS131 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 56 and Radeon RX 7400

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 56

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon RX 7400

The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 12,104 and the Radeon RX 7400 reaches 11,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX 7400 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400). Raw compute: 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 2300 MHz.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 7400
G3D Mark Score
12,104+4%
11,654
Architecture
GCN 5.0
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
14 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
3584+100%
1792
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.96 TFLOPS
16.49 TFLOPS+84%
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
2300 MHz+84%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
224+100%
112
L1 Cache
896 KB+75%
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR 3 + AFMF

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 7400
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7400 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7400 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 7400
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 7400
DirectX
12.1
12.2
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400).

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 7400
Encoder
VCE 4.0
VCN 4.0
Decoder
UVD 7.0
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 draws 210W versus the Radeon RX 7400's 43W — a 132% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 450W (Radeon RX 7400). Power connectors: Integrated vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 7400
TDP
210W
43W-80%
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
450W
Power Connector
Integrated
None
Length
267mm
241mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
57.6
271.0+370%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199. The Radeon RX 7400 costs 50.1% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.3 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 93.4% better value. The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2017).

FeatureRadeon Pro Vega 56Radeon RX 7400
MSRP
$399
$199-50%
Performance per Dollar
30.3
58.6+93%
Codename
Vega 10
Navi 33
Release
August 14 2017
August 8 2025
Ranking
#222
#229