G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs Radeon RX 7400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs Radeon RX 7400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro Vega 56

2017

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7400 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
100.5% HIGHER MSRP
$399 MSRPvs$199 MSRP

Radeon RX 7400

2025

Why buy it

✅30.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 93% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 7400 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 30.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro Vega 56 instead at 12,104 vs 11,654, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 7400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Radeon Pro Vega 56 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 14nm, and 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 7400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $200 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 93% (58.6 vs 30.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs Radeon RX 7400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro Vega 56

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 7400

The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 12,104 and the Radeon RX 7400 reaches 11,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX 7400 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400). Raw compute: 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 2300 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 56	Radeon RX 7400
G3D Mark Score	12,104+4%	11,654
Architecture	GCN 5.0	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	14 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	3584+100%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.96 TFLOPS	16.49 TFLOPS+84%
Boost Clock	1250 MHz	2300 MHz+84%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	224+100%	112
L1 Cache	896 KB+75%	512 KB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 56	Radeon RX 7400
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7400 carries 8 GB. Radeon RX 7400 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 56 and 64-bit on the Radeon RX 7400. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 56	Radeon RX 7400
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 56	Radeon RX 7400
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400).

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 56	Radeon RX 7400
Encoder	VCE 4.0	VCN 4.0
Decoder	UVD 7.0	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 draws 210W versus the Radeon RX 7400's 43W — a 132% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 450W (Radeon RX 7400). Power connectors: Integrated vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 56	Radeon RX 7400
TDP	210W	43W-80%
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	450W
Power Connector	Integrated	None
Length	267mm	241mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	57.6	271.0+370%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro Vega 56 came in at $399, while the Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon RX 7400 was 50.1% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.3 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 93.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 7400 (2025 vs 2017).

Feature	Radeon Pro Vega 56	Radeon RX 7400
MSRP	$399	$199-50%
Performance per Dollar	30.3	58.6+93%
Codename	Vega 10	Navi 33
Release	August 14 2017	August 8 2025
Ranking	#222	#229

Search Radeon Pro Vega 56 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 7400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.