Radeon PRO V710 vs Radeon Pro Vega 56

AMD

Radeon PRO V710

2024Core: 1900 MHzBoost: 2000 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 56

2017Core: 1138 MHzBoost: 1250 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon PRO V710 vs Radeon Pro Vega 56 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon PRO V710 vs Radeon Pro Vega 56 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon PRO V710 vs Radeon Pro Vega 56: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon PRO V710

2024

Why buy it

  • 56.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 158W instead of 210W, a 52W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 401.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Radeon Pro Vega 56

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 405.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.3 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO V710 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 32.9% higher power demand at 210W vs 158W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon PRO V710 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 56.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro Vega 56 instead at 12,104 vs 12,000, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO V710 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 14nm, 54 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2017. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro Vega 56 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,601 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 405.6% (30.3 vs 6.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, Radeon Pro Vega 56 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Radeon PRO V710 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon PRO V710 vs Radeon Pro Vega 56 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon PRO V710

The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 56

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO V710 scores 12,000 and the Radeon Pro Vega 56 reaches 12,104 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO V710 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Raw compute: 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710) vs 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

FeatureRadeon PRO V710Radeon Pro Vega 56
G3D Mark Score
12,000
12,104
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
GCN 5.0
Process Node
5 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
3456
3584+4%
Compute (TFLOPS)
27.65 TFLOPS+209%
8.96 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2000 MHz+60%
1250 MHz
ROPs
96+50%
64
TMUs
216
224+4%
L1 Cache
768 KB
896 KB+17%
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon PRO V710Radeon Pro Vega 56
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon PRO V710 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 carries 0 MB. Radeon PRO V710 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO V710 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 56. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 56) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon PRO V710Radeon Pro Vega 56
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon PRO V710Radeon Pro Vega 56
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56).

FeatureRadeon PRO V710Radeon Pro Vega 56
Encoder
VCN 4.0
VCE 4.0
Decoder
VCN 4.0
UVD 7.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO V710 draws 158W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 56's 210W — a 28.3% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO V710) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

FeatureRadeon PRO V710Radeon Pro Vega 56
TDP
158W-25%
210W
Recommended PSU
500W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85°C
Perf/Watt
75.9+32%
57.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon PRO V710 came in at $2000, while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 launched at $399. On MSRP, Radeon Pro Vega 56 was 80% cheaper ($1601 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 30.3 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 offers 405% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO V710 (2024 vs 2017).

FeatureRadeon PRO V710Radeon Pro Vega 56
MSRP
$2000
$399-80%
Performance per Dollar
6.0
30.3+405%
Codename
Navi 32
Vega 10
Release
October 3 2024
August 14 2017
Ranking
#196
#222

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.