Radeon PRO V710 vs Tesla P40
Radeon PRO V710
Popular choices:
Tesla P40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO V710
Performance Per Dollar Tesla P40
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon PRO V710 is significantly newer (2024 vs 2016). The Radeon PRO V710 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla P40 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO V710 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Tesla P40 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon PRO V710 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla P40 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $2,000 for the Radeon PRO V710, it costs 93% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1212% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO V710 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1212%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,000) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO V710 and Tesla P40
Radeon PRO V710
The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.
Tesla P40
The Tesla P40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,808 points. Launch price was $5,699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO V710 scores 12,000 and the Tesla P40 reaches 11,808 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO V710 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Tesla P40 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 3,840 (Tesla P40). Raw compute: 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710) vs 11.76 TFLOPS (Tesla P40). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,000+2% | 11,808 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3456 | 3840+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 27.65 TFLOPS+135% | 11.76 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+31% | 1531 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 216 | 240+11% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1.4 MB+87% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO V710 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla P40 has 24 GB. The Tesla P40 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) vs 3 MB (Tesla P40) — the Tesla P40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 12.1 (Tesla P40). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla P40). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla P40).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO V710 draws 158W versus the Tesla P40's 250W — a 45.1% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO V710) vs 500W (Tesla P40). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 158W-37% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 75.9+61% | 47.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $2000, while the Tesla P40 launched at $5699 and now averages $150. The Tesla P40 costs 92.5% less ($1850 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 78.7 (Tesla P40) — the Tesla P40 offers 1211.7% better value. The Radeon PRO V710 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000-65% | $5699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2000 | $150-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | 78.7+1212% |
| Codename | Navi 32 | GP102 |
| Release | October 3 2024 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #196 | #227 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO V710 and Tesla P40
