
Radeon PRO V710 vs RTX A4000H

Radeon PRO V710
Popular choices:

RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO V710
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000H
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO V710 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX A4000H.
| Insight | Radeon PRO V710 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The RTX A4000H offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $927 versus $2,000 for the Radeon PRO V710, it costs 54% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 112.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO V710 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+112.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,000) | ✅More affordable ($927) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO V710 and RTX A4000H

Radeon PRO V710
The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.

RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO V710 scores 12,000 and the RTX A4000H reaches 11,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO V710 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 54 RT cores (Radeon PRO V710) vs 48 (RTX A4000H) vs 192.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,000+2% | 11,815 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3456 | 6144+78% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 27.65 TFLOPS+44% | 19.17 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+28% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 216+13% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 6 MB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 54+13% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO V710) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000H) — the RTX A4000H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710) vs None (RTX A4000H).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | None |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | None |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO V710 draws 158W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 12.1% difference. The RTX A4000H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO V710) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 158W | 140W-11% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 75.9 | 84.4+11% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $2000, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000 and now averages $927. The RTX A4000H costs 53.6% less ($1073 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 12.7 (RTX A4000H) — the RTX A4000H offers 111.7% better value. The Radeon PRO V710 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $1000-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2000 | $927-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | 12.7+112% |
| Codename | Navi 32 | GA104 |
| Release | October 3 2024 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #196 | #226 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















