Radeon Pro Vega 56
Tesla P40
Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs Tesla P40 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs Tesla P40 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs Tesla P40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,300 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1364.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.3 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 210W instead of 250W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Tesla P40
2016Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon Pro Vega 56 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Tesla P40 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 24 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌1328.3% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 30.3 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌19% higher power demand at 250W vs 210W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs Tesla P40 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon Pro Vega 56
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.
Tesla P40
The Tesla P40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,808 points. Launch price was $5,699.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 12,104 and the Tesla P40 reaches 11,808 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Tesla P40 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 3,840 (Tesla P40). Raw compute: 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 11.76 TFLOPS (Tesla P40). Boost clocks: 1250 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,104+3% | 11,808 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 3840+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.96 TFLOPS | 11.76 TFLOPS+31% |
| Boost Clock | 1250 MHz | 1531 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 224 | 240+7% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 1.4 MB+59% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Tesla P40 carries 24 GB. Tesla P40 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 56 and 256-bit on the Tesla P40. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 3 MB (Tesla P40) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 12.1 (Tesla P40). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla P40). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla P40).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 draws 210W versus the Tesla P40's 250W — a 17.4% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 500W (Tesla P40). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 210W-16% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 57.6+22% | 47.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro Vega 56 came in at $399, while the Tesla P40 launched at $5699. On MSRP, Radeon Pro Vega 56 was 93% cheaper ($5300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 30.3 (Radeon Pro Vega 56) vs 2.1 (Tesla P40) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 offers 1342.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro Vega 56 (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | Tesla P40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-93% | $5699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.3+1343% | 2.1 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GP102 |
| Release | August 14 2017 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #222 | #227 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro Vega 56 and Tesla P40
