Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs Arc A770
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Popular choices:
Arc A770
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Performance Per Dollar Arc A770
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A770 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) (14nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Alchemist / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | Standard Buffer (0 MB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (280mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc A770 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $280 versus $2,200 for the Radeon Pro Vega 64X, it costs 87% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 683.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+683.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,200) | ✅More affordable ($280) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 64X and Arc A770
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.
Arc A770
The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 13,369 and the Arc A770 reaches 13,332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is built on GCN 5.0 while the Arc A770 uses Generation 12.7, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 4,096 (Arc A770). Raw compute: 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,369 | 13,332 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.03 TFLOPS | 19.66 TFLOPS+63% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 2400 MHz+63% |
| ROPs | 64 | 128+100% |
| TMUs | 256 | 256 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 16 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Arc A770 has 16 GB. The Arc A770 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 16 MB (Arc A770) — the Arc A770 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 16 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A770). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | Dual Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X draws 250W versus the Arc A770's 225W — a 10.5% difference. The Arc A770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 650W (Arc A770). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin + 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 280mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 225W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin + 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 280mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 53.5 | 59.3+11% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X launched at $2200 MSRP and currently averages $2200, while the Arc A770 launched at $349 and now averages $280. The Arc A770 costs 87.3% less ($1920 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 47.6 (Arc A770) — the Arc A770 offers 680.3% better value. The Arc A770 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2200 | $349-84% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2200 | $280-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 47.6+680% |
| Codename | Vega 10 | DG2-512 |
| Release | March 19 2019 | October 12 2022 |
| Ranking | #190 | #191 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro Vega 64X and Arc A770
