Radeon Pro Vega 64X
RTX A2000
Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs RTX A2000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs RTX A2000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs RTX A2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A2000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌388.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,200 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($2,200 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
RTX A2000
2021Why buy it
- ✅8.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 392.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs RTX A2000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.
RTX A2000
The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 13,369 and the RTX A2000 reaches 13,464 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is built on GCN 5.0 while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000). Raw compute: 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,369 | 13,464 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+23% | 3328 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.03 TFLOPS+51% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz+22% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 256+146% | 104 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 3.3 MB+230% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A2000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X has 0 MB of VRAM, while the RTX A2000 carries 8 GB. RTX A2000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 64X and 128-bit on the RTX A2000. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X draws 250W versus the RTX A2000's 70W — a 112.5% difference. The RTX A2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 500W (RTX A2000). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 167mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 70W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 167mm |
| Height | 0mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 53.5 | 192.3+259% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro Vega 64X came in at $2200, while the RTX A2000 launched at $450. On MSRP, RTX A2000 was 79.5% cheaper ($1750 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 29.9 (RTX A2000) — the RTX A2000 offers 390.2% better value. The newer card here is RTX A2000 (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2200 | $450-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 29.9+390% |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GA106 |
| Release | March 19 2019 | August 10 2021 |
| Ranking | #190 | #186 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro Vega 64X and RTX A2000
