Quadro GP100
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Quadro GP100 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro GP100 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro GP100 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro GP100
2016Why buy it
- ✅43.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon Pro Vega 64X is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro GP100 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 16 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌218.2% HIGHER MSRP$7,000 MSRPvs$2,200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,800 less on MSRP ($2,200 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 210.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($2,200 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro GP100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro GP100 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro GP100
The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro GP100 scores 13,710 and the Radeon Pro Vega 64X reaches 13,369 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro GP100 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X uses GCN 5.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Quadro GP100) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Raw compute: 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100) vs 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,710+3% | 13,369 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 4096+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.34 TFLOPS | 12.03 TFLOPS+16% |
| Boost Clock | 1442 MHz | 1468 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224 | 256+14% |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB+30% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro GP100 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X carries 0 MB. Quadro GP100 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 4096-bit on the Quadro GP100 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 64X.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+3100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Quadro GP100) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th gen | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro GP100 draws 235W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 250W — a 6.2% difference. The Quadro GP100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro GP100) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 235W-6% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 58.3+9% | 53.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro GP100 came in at $7000, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X launched at $2200. On MSRP, Radeon Pro Vega 64X was 68.6% cheaper ($4800 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (Quadro GP100) vs 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64X offers 205% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro Vega 64X (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro GP100 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7000 | $2200-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 6.1+205% |
| Codename | GP100 | Vega 10 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | March 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #178 | #190 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro GP100 and Radeon Pro Vega 64X
