Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Titan X Pascal
Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs Titan X Pascal Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs Titan X Pascal FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs Titan X Pascal: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
2019Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Titan X Pascal across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌83.5% HIGHER MSRP$2,200 MSRPvs$1,199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($2,200 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
Titan X Pascal
2016Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,001 less on MSRP ($1,199 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 87.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon Pro Vega 64X is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Titan X Pascal is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs Titan X Pascal Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.
Titan X Pascal
The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 13,369 and the Titan X Pascal reaches 13,660 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is built on GCN 5.0 while the Titan X Pascal uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 3,584 (Titan X Pascal). Raw compute: 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,369 | 13,660+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+14% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.03 TFLOPS+10% | 10.97 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 1531 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 256+14% | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 1.3 MB+30% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Titan X Pascal carries 8 GB. Titan X Pascal gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 64X and 384-bit on the Titan X Pascal. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 3 MB (Titan X Pascal) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 12.1 (Titan X Pascal). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X draws 250W versus the Titan X Pascal's 250W — a 0% difference. The Titan X Pascal is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 600W (Titan X Pascal). Power connectors: Integrated vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 600W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 53.5 | 54.6+2% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro Vega 64X came in at $2200, while the Titan X Pascal launched at $1199. On MSRP, Titan X Pascal was 45.5% cheaper ($1001 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 11.4 (Titan X Pascal) — the Titan X Pascal offers 86.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro Vega 64X (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2200 | $1199-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 11.4+87% |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GP102 |
| Release | March 19 2019 | August 2 2016 |
| Ranking | #190 | #198 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro Vega 64X and Titan X Pascal
