Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs Titan X Pascal
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Popular choices:
Titan X Pascal
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Titan X Pascal lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Titan X Pascal is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro Vega 64X.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | Standard Buffer (0 MB) | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Titan X Pascal offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $2,200 for the Radeon Pro Vega 64X, it costs 91% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1023.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1023.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,200) | ✅More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 64X and Titan X Pascal
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.
Titan X Pascal
The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 13,369 and the Titan X Pascal reaches 13,660 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is built on GCN 5.0 while the Titan X Pascal uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 3,584 (Titan X Pascal). Raw compute: 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,369 | 13,660+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+14% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.03 TFLOPS+10% | 10.97 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 1531 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 256+14% | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 1.3 MB+30% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Titan X Pascal has 8 GB. The Titan X Pascal offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 3 MB (Titan X Pascal) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 12.1 (Titan X Pascal). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X draws 250W versus the Titan X Pascal's 250W — a 0% difference. The Titan X Pascal is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 600W (Titan X Pascal). Power connectors: Integrated vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 600W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 53.5 | 54.6+2% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X launched at $2200 MSRP and currently averages $2200, while the Titan X Pascal launched at $1199 and now averages $200. The Titan X Pascal costs 90.9% less ($2000 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) vs 68.3 (Titan X Pascal) — the Titan X Pascal offers 1019.7% better value. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 64X | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2200 | $1199-46% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2200 | $200-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1 | 68.3+1020% |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GP102 |
| Release | March 19 2019 | August 2 2016 |
| Ranking | #190 | #198 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro Vega 64X and Titan X Pascal
