Arc A770 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X

CPU

GPU

Arc A770

2022Core: 2100 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Arc family

···

Buy on Amazon

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

2019Core: 1250 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Arc A770 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X Performance Spectrum

Arc A770

16 GB 225

13,332

0.0%

Arc Graphics 130V

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

Shared System RAM 250

13,369

+0.3%

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

Radeon RX 7800 XT

Radeon RX 6900 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A770 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A770 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A770

2022

Why buy it

✅46.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 528.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs Unknown).
✅Better long-term bet: Alchemist on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

2019

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
530.4% HIGHER MSRP
$2,200 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($2,200 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A770 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 46.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro Vega 64X instead at 13,369 vs 13,332, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A770 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 16 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 14nm, 32 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc A770 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,851 cheaper on MSRP at $349 vs $2,200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 528.6% (38.2 vs 6.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Arc A770 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A770

The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770 scores 13,332 and the Radeon Pro Vega 64X reaches 13,369 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X uses GCN 5.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Raw compute: 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770) vs 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
G3D Mark Score	13,332	13,369
Architecture	Generation 12.7	GCN 5.0
Process Node	6 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4096	4096
Compute (TFLOPS)	19.66 TFLOPS+63%	12.03 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+63%	1468 MHz
ROPs	128+100%	64
TMUs	256	256
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X carries 0 MB. Arc A770 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A770 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 64X. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the Arc A770 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
VRAM Capacity	16 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A770) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X).

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	VCE 4.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	UVD 7.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770 draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The Arc A770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A770) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 280mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
TDP	225W-10%	250W
Recommended PSU	650W	1W-100%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	Integrated
Length	280mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	59.3+11%	53.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A770 came in at $349, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X launched at $2200. On MSRP, Arc A770 was 84.1% cheaper ($1851 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.2 (Arc A770) vs 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the Arc A770 offers 526.2% better value. The newer card here is Arc A770 (2022 vs 2019).

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
MSRP	$349-84%	$2200
Performance per Dollar	38.2+526%	6.1
Codename	DG2-512	Vega 10
Release	October 12 2022	March 19 2019
Ranking	#191	#190

Search Arc A770 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro Vega 64X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.