CPU
GPU
Arc A770
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A770
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Arc A770 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Arc A770 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Alchemist / 6nm) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | Standard Buffer (0 MB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (280mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc A770 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $280 versus $2,200 for the Radeon Pro Vega 64X, it costs 87% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 683.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Arc A770 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+683.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($280) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770 and Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Arc A770
The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A770 scores 13,332 and the Radeon Pro Vega 64X reaches 13,369 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X uses GCN 5.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Raw compute: 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770) vs 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A770 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,332 | 13,369 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.66 TFLOPS+63% | 12.03 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+63% | 1468 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+100% | 64 |
| TMUs | 256 | 256 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A770 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A770 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X has 0 MB. The Arc A770 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the Arc A770 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A770 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A770) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A770 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X).
| Feature | Arc A770 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A770 draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The Arc A770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A770) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 280mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Arc A770 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-10% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 280mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 59.3+11% | 53.5 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A770 launched at $349 MSRP and currently averages $280, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X launched at $2200 and now averages $2200. The Arc A770 costs 87.3% less ($1920 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 47.6 (Arc A770) vs 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the Arc A770 offers 680.3% better value. The Arc A770 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Arc A770 | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-84% | $2200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $280-87% | $2200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 47.6+680% | 6.1 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | Vega 10 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | March 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #191 | #190 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A770 and Radeon Pro Vega 64X
