Arc A770 vs Radeon PRO W7500

CPU

GPU

Arc A770

2022Core: 2100 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Arc family

···

Buy on Amazon

Radeon PRO W7500

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 1700 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Arc A770 vs Radeon PRO W7500 Performance Spectrum

Arc A770

16 GB 225

13,332

+0.3%

Arc Graphics 130V

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

13,298

0.0%

Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

Radeon RX 7800 XT

Radeon RX 6900 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A770 vs Radeon PRO W7500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A770 vs Radeon PRO W7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A770

2022

Why buy it

✅21.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Delivers 23.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌221.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 70W.
❌29.6% longer card at 280mm vs 216mm.

Radeon PRO W7500

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 70W instead of 225W, a 155W reduction.
✅Measures 216mm instead of 280mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
22.9% HIGHER MSRP
$429 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A770 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (13,332 vs 13,298), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W7500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2022. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc A770 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $80 cheaper on MSRP at $349 vs $429, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 23.2% (38.2 vs 31.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, Arc A770 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Radeon PRO W7500 has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A770 vs Radeon PRO W7500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A770

The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon PRO W7500

The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770 scores 13,332 and the Radeon PRO W7500 reaches 13,298 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 6 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1700 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W7500) with 512 Tensor cores.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7500
G3D Mark Score	13,332	13,298
Architecture	Generation 12.7	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	6 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	4096+129%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	19.66 TFLOPS+61%	12.19 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+41%	1700 MHz
ROPs	128+100%	64
TMUs	256+129%	112
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	32+14%	28

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7500
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7500 carries 8 GB. Arc A770 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A770 and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W7500. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) — the Arc A770 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7500
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A770) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7500
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7500
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	VCN 4.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770 draws 225W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 105.1% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A770) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 280mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7500
TDP	225W	70W-69%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	280mm	216mm
Height	—	115mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	59.3	190.0+220%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A770 came in at $349, while the Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429. On MSRP, Arc A770 was 18.6% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.2 (Arc A770) vs 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) — the Arc A770 offers 23.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7500 (2023 vs 2022).

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7500
MSRP	$349-19%	$429
Performance per Dollar	38.2+23%	31.0
Codename	DG2-512	Navi 33
Release	October 12 2022	August 3 2023
Ranking	#191	#192

Search Arc A770 on Amazon

Search Radeon PRO W7500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.