
Arc A770

Radeon RX 6700M
Arc A770 vs Radeon RX 6700M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A770 vs Radeon RX 6700M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A770 vs Radeon RX 6700M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A770
2022Why buy it
- ✅5.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 10 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Radeon RX 6700M is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 225W vs 135W.
Radeon RX 6700M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 135W instead of 225W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 10 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A770 vs Radeon RX 6700M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A770
The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon RX 6700M
The Radeon RX 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1489 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 135W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,525 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A770 scores 13,332 and the Radeon RX 6700M reaches 13,525 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon RX 6700M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700M). Raw compute: 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770) vs 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700M). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770) vs 36 (Radeon RX 6700M) with 512 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Arc A770 | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,332 | 13,525+1% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+78% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.66 TFLOPS+78% | 11.06 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+100% | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+78% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+433% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | 36+13% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6700M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Arc A770 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Arc A770 | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A770 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700M carries 10 GB. Arc A770 gives you 60% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700M) — a 60% advantage for the Arc A770. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A770 and 160-bit on the Radeon RX 6700M. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700M) — the Arc A770 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A770 | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+60% | 10 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+60% | 320 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+60% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+433% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A770) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6700M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Arc A770 | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6700M). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6700M).
| Feature | Arc A770 | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A770 draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 6700M's 135W — a 50% difference. The Radeon RX 6700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A770) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6700M). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 280mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Arc A770 | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 135W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 280mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 59.3 | 100.2+69% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Arc A770 (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | Arc A770 | Radeon RX 6700M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | — |
| Codename | DG2-512 | Navi 22 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | May 31 2021 |
| Ranking | #191 | #183 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















