Arc A770 vs Radeon RX 6700M

Intel

Arc A770

2022Core: 2100 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz
Arc family
···
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6700M

2021Core: 1489 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Arc A770 vs Radeon RX 6700M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A770 vs Radeon RX 6700M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A770 vs Radeon RX 6700M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A770

2022

Why buy it

  • 5.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 60% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 10 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Radeon RX 6700M is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 225W vs 135W.

Radeon RX 6700M

2021

Why buy it

  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 135W instead of 225W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Arc A770 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 10 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc A770 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX 6700M instead at 13,525 vs 13,332, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 6700M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Arc A770 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support and 36 vs 32 ray-tracing units. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A770 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, Arc A770 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Radeon RX 6700M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A770 vs Radeon RX 6700M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A770

The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.

AMD

Radeon RX 6700M

The Radeon RX 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1489 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 135W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,525 points.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770 scores 13,332 and the Radeon RX 6700M reaches 13,525 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon RX 6700M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700M). Raw compute: 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770) vs 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700M). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770) vs 36 (Radeon RX 6700M) with 512 Tensor cores.

FeatureArc A770Radeon RX 6700M
G3D Mark Score
13,332
13,525+1%
Architecture
Generation 12.7
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
6 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
4096+78%
2304
Compute (TFLOPS)
19.66 TFLOPS+78%
11.06 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
2400 MHz
ROPs
128+100%
64
TMUs
256+78%
144
L2 Cache
16 MB+433%
3 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
32
36+13%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6700M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Arc A770 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureArc A770Radeon RX 6700M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700M carries 10 GB. Arc A770 gives you 60% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700M) — a 60% advantage for the Arc A770. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A770 and 160-bit on the Radeon RX 6700M. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700M) — the Arc A770 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A770Radeon RX 6700M
VRAM Capacity
16 GB+60%
10 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s+60%
320 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+60%
160-bit
L2 Cache
16 MB+433%
3 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A770) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6700M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

FeatureArc A770Radeon RX 6700M
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+300%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6700M). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6700M).

FeatureArc A770Radeon RX 6700M
Encoder
Dual Xe Media Engine
VCN 3.0
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
VCN 3.0
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770 draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 6700M's 135W — a 50% difference. The Radeon RX 6700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A770) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6700M). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 280mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

FeatureArc A770Radeon RX 6700M
TDP
225W
135W-40%
Recommended PSU
650W
500W-23%
Power Connector
8-pin + 6-pin
Mobile
Length
280mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
59.3
100.2+69%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A770 (2022 vs 2021).

FeatureArc A770Radeon RX 6700M
MSRP
$349
Codename
DG2-512
Navi 22
Release
October 12 2022
May 31 2021
Ranking
#191
#183

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.