Arc A770 vs Titan X Pascal

CPU

GPU

Arc A770

2022Core: 2100 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Arc family

···

Buy on Amazon

Titan X Pascal

2016Core: 1417 MHzBoost: 1531 MHz

Similar parts

···

Buy on Amazon

Arc A770 vs Titan X Pascal Performance Spectrum

Arc A770

16 GB 225

13,332

0.0%

Arc Graphics 130V

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

13,660

+2.5%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU

TITAN V CEO Edition

TITAN RTX

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (móvel)

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A770 vs Titan X Pascal FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A770 vs Titan X Pascal: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A770

2022

Why buy it

✅9.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $850 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 235.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Alchemist on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Titan X Pascal

2016

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
243.6% HIGHER MSRP
$1,199 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Arc A770 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Titan X Pascal instead at 13,660 vs 13,332, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A770 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 16 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 16nm, 32 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc A770 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $850 cheaper on MSRP at $349 vs $1,199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 235.3% (38.2 vs 11.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Arc A770 vs Titan X Pascal Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A770

The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.

Titan X Pascal

The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770 scores 13,332 and the Titan X Pascal reaches 13,660 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Titan X Pascal uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770) vs 3,584 (Titan X Pascal). Raw compute: 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770) vs 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1531 MHz.

Feature	Arc A770	Titan X Pascal
G3D Mark Score	13,332	13,660+2%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Pascal
Process Node	6 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	4096+14%	3584
Compute (TFLOPS)	19.66 TFLOPS+79%	10.97 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+57%	1531 MHz
ROPs	128+33%	96
TMUs	256+14%	224
L2 Cache	16 MB+433%	3 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A770	Titan X Pascal
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Titan X Pascal carries 8 GB. Arc A770 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770) vs 480 GB/s (Titan X Pascal) — a 6.7% advantage for the Arc A770. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A770 and 384-bit on the Titan X Pascal. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770) vs 3 MB (Titan X Pascal) — the Arc A770 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A770	Titan X Pascal
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5X
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s+7%	480 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	384-bit+50%
L2 Cache	16 MB+433%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A770) vs 12.1 (Titan X Pascal). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A770	Titan X Pascal
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal).

Feature	Arc A770	Titan X Pascal
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	NVENC 5.0 (2x)
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770 draws 225W versus the Titan X Pascal's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The Arc A770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A770) vs 600W (Titan X Pascal). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 280mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Arc A770	Titan X Pascal
TDP	225W-10%	250W
Recommended PSU	650W	600W-8%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	280mm	267mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	59.3+9%	54.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A770 came in at $349, while the Titan X Pascal launched at $1199. On MSRP, Arc A770 was 70.9% cheaper ($850 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.2 (Arc A770) vs 11.4 (Titan X Pascal) — the Arc A770 offers 235.1% better value. The newer card here is Arc A770 (2022 vs 2016).

Feature	Arc A770	Titan X Pascal
MSRP	$349-71%	$1199
Performance per Dollar	38.2+235%	11.4
Codename	DG2-512	GP102
Release	October 12 2022	August 2 2016
Ranking	#191	#198

Search Arc A770 on Amazon

Search Titan X Pascal on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.