Arc A770
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Arc A770 vs RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A770 vs RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A770 vs RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A770
2022Why buy it
- ✅48.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌542.9% higher power demand at 225W vs 35W.
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 225W, a 190W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A770 vs RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc A770
The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,209 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A770 scores 13,332 and the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile reaches 13,209 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770 is built on Generation 12.7 while the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770) vs 1,792 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Raw compute: 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770) vs 9.032 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770) vs 14 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) with 512 Tensor cores vs 56.
| Feature | Arc A770 | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,332 | 13,209 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+129% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.66 TFLOPS+118% | 9.032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2520 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 128+433% | 24 |
| TMUs | 256+357% | 56 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB | 24 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32+129% | 14 |
| Tensor Cores | 512+814% | 56 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A770 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc A770 | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A770 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile carries 8 GB. Arc A770 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A770 and 256-bit on the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770) vs 24 MB (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) — the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A770 | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB | 24 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A770) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Arc A770 | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile).
| Feature | Arc A770 | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A770 draws 225W versus the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile's 35W — a 146.2% difference. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A770) vs 500W (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 280mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc A770 | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 35W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 280mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 59.3 | 377.4+536% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc A770 | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349 | — |
| Codename | DG2-512 | GB207 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | March 19 2025 |
| Ranking | #191 | #244 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A770 and RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
