Arc A770 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

CPU

GPU

Arc A770

2022Core: 2100 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Arc family

···

Buy on Amazon

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

2021Core: 1800 MHzBoost: 1967 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Arc A770 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot Performance Spectrum

Arc A770

16 GB 225

13,332

+1.1%

Arc Graphics 130V

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

8 GB 400

13,182

0.0%

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A770 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A770 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A770

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,150 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 914% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Draws 225W instead of 400W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

2021

Why buy it

✅7.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
902.6% HIGHER MSRP
$3,499 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
❌77.8% higher power demand at 400W vs 225W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Arc A770 instead at 13,332 vs 13,182, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A770 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 16 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM, a 6nm process instead of 7nm, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2021. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Arc A770 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $3,150 cheaper on MSRP at $349 vs $3,499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 914% (38.2 vs 3.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Arc A770 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A770

The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770 scores 13,332 and the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot reaches 13,182 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1967 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770) vs 60 ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) with 512 Tensor cores.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
G3D Mark Score	13,332+1%	13,182
Architecture	Generation 12.7	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	6 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	4096+7%	3840 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)	19.66 TFLOPS+30%	15.11 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+22%	1967 MHz
ROPs	128+33%	96 ×2
TMUs	256+7%	240 ×2
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	32	60 ×2+88%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770 has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot carries 8 GB. Arc A770 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — a 68.8% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Arc A770 and 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the Arc A770 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s	864 GB/s+69%
Bus Width	256-bit	384-bit+50%
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A770) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	VCN 4.0 (2x)
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	VCN 4.0 (2x)
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770 draws 225W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 56% difference. The Arc A770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A770) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 280mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
TDP	225W-44%	400W
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	280mm	280mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	59.3+80%	33.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Arc A770 came in at $349, while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot launched at $3499. On MSRP, Arc A770 was 90% cheaper ($3150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.2 (Arc A770) vs 3.8 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — the Arc A770 offers 905.3% better value. The newer card here is Arc A770 (2022 vs 2021).

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
MSRP	$349-90%	$3499
Performance per Dollar	38.2+905%	3.8
Codename	DG2-512	Navi 21
Release	October 12 2022	August 3 2021
Ranking	#191	#157

Search Arc A770 on Amazon

Search Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.